"Mirar @ Pike importmöte för mailinglistan" <<6341[at]lyskom.lysator.liu.se>>
skrev:
> If there isn't any collision between Stdio.FILE and Stdio.File, I
> don't see why FakeFile shouldn't be able to be both.
The same reasoning could be applied to Stdio.File itself, and
therefore also the same arguments against it. I can imagine some of
those arguments are that it would add bloat, it would reduce typing,
and it would blur concepts that preferably can remain separated. Why
not make a FakeFILE which extends FakeFile the same way Stdio.FILE
extends Stdio.File?
|