Just a note: This list has been broken since a mail server upgrade
last Thursday. I've gotten your mails anyway and you've got mine, but
the list has not. It should work again now.
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <<srb[at]cuci.nl>> wrote:
> Martin Stjernholm wrote:
>>I'm sure it's excellent, but unfortunately I don't have the time to
>>get acquanted with it enough to vouch for an inclusion in the standard
>>dist.
>
> Understandably. BTW, there is a reason why there not a lot of comments
> in that code; I don't want to make it easier than necessary for a spammer
> trying to understand what we're doing here.
>
>>Imho it'd make a fine third-party module. I guess the reason you've
>>patched it into vform.pike is to add it to the internal tag set of the
>><vform> tag.
>
> Correct. It lets it be a local tag to vform, and allows testing for
> failure using the vform-conditionals.
>
>> It could be possible to hook it in there even from a
>>separate module. Or if it isn't, I'm more likely to accept a patch
>>that makes that tag set extensible in some way.
>
> I'll look into this, eventually.
>
>>Btw, your latest patch list is marked in my mail box, but I haven't
>>gotten that far through it yet..
>
> BTW, when you eventually get to looking at the strain, please be sure to
> resync with the BuGless branch, because since my last mail enumerating
> the patches, I have updated some of them (essential updates).
Roger. I guess that means I should look for a later BuGless.mast*
branch.
|