roxen.lists.pike.general

Subject Author Date
RE: Arrays: multi-pop? Jonas Walldén @ Pike importmö <6341[at]lyskom[dot]lysator[dot]liu[dot]se> 10-09-2009
> Well, I prefer my version because of memory usage (you only need to
> keep a copy of 5000 elements instead of all the elements in groups
> of 5000)

Couldn't the foreach() iterator do the same internally? If the
optimizer knows how to rewrite foreach(some_string / "\n", ...) into a
line iterator it would be nice if foreach(some_array / 5000.0, ...)
did something similar. Or maybe it does already? Of course, strings
being immutable is a significant property that may account for the
difference.