roxen.lists.pike.general

Subject Author Date
Re: Less filling (Re: Startup times Pike vs. Perl) Stephen R. van den Berg <srb[at]cuci[dot]nl> 19-08-2009 
Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>Just for the record, the (currently for me) best tradeof for running Pike on

Forgot to mention why it is worth it:
In my case, it trims down the disk-footprint of Pike from around 40MB to
around 13MB.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.
Currently unemployed programmer:
"What do you mean, I can't initialize things in an assert()?"