Yes, my reasons for using an older version of Caudium were 3 fold: 1)
newer versions of Caudium were still in development, and 2) packages were
already available and 3) i figured that older == leaner == less strain on
a constrained environment.
Because change on the caudium side of things is slower, I think we'd still
support older versions with bug fixes, etc.
>>> Older versions of anything = not well supported (I guess).
>
>> i don't think bill meant to imply that he used an older version
>> intentionally a newer would not run, but rather that it's an older setup
>> and it's no longer running, so upgrading does not apply.
>
> I see. That changes things a bit.
>
> I'd totally forgotten about Pike's small http server. That might allow
> me to drop another package from my flash/memory-footprint (lighttpd).
I didn't suggest that as I figured you'd already consdidered that
alternative. You might also briefly consider fins, which uses
Protocols.HTTP.Server to provide an alternative MVC app server
environment ala Rails.
Bill
|