[The "Pike (-) general" lyskom forum is a bit useless I think. If it's
in english it could just as well go out on the pike mailing list.
Redirecting.]
Tor Edvardsson wrote:
> > indices(GTK);
> (1) Result: ({ })
>
> Is there any special reason not to ship the latest pike with GTK
> included?
From my notes on the windows compilation environment:
o GTK2:
o Pike must be configured --without-GTK to allow GTK2 to be
configured correctly, since the config cache names overlap
between GTK and GTK2.
I think this is the reason - it turned out that one has to choose one
or the other on windows. I only took a brief look at making the config
cache names unique, but I guess I thought it to be more work than I
was willing to do at the time. Don't think it's particularly difficult
to clean this up though, it just takes some doing..
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
>17263088 2009-02-05 01:10 /5 lines/ Tor Edvardsson
>Recipients: Pike (-) general
>Subject: GTK on Pike v7.8 release 116 win32
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>> indices(GTK);
>(1) Result: ({ })
>
>Is there any special reason not to ship the latest pike with GTK
>included?
>
>(17263088) /Tor Edvardsson/-----------------------------------------
>
|