Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
>Is this the correct roxen repo for git?
>git://git.cuci.nl/roxen
It is correct.
>I often have problems with it. I get messages about the caudium being
>unavailable. Also, I have tried to clone it and after a day or so I get
>that it is already in a merge.
Well, I'll clean up the dangling references to it now, mast asked about
it already.
>git-roxen
>You are in the middle of a conflicted merge.
That might be me switching branches in that repo.
The branch that you can trust is named 5.0, which simply is a mirror
of the live one at the Roxen CVS.
I.e. even if git clone wouldn't work,
git init
git fetch -f git://git.cuci.nl/roxen 5.0:5.0
should always work.
>Has roxen been moved to git or is CVS still the main source?
CVS is still primary.
>BTW, I prefer git to cvs.
Retry the git repo in 15 minutes.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Real programmers don't produce results, they return exit codes.
|