Martin B?hr wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>> Older versions of anything = not well supported (I guess).
>i don't think bill meant to imply that he used an older version
>intentionally a newer would not run, but rather that it's an older setup
>and it's no longer running, so upgrading does not apply.
I see. That changes things a bit.
>> So, then I'd have to choose between:
>> a. An existing more-complex-system-than-needed which I mostly need to support
>> myself.
>which you can still make usefull to others, enlisting their support.
True. But since it's a lot more complex, for a fairly limited setup, this
might (at times) be unwieldy.
>you are missing the other option bill suggested, using scriptrunner,
>which is another existing system which might just be more fitting.
I'll have a look at scriptrunner, to see what it does exactly.
>personally, i'd just run pikes small http server and add some custom
>classes to serve pages as needed, maybe use scriptrunner for that...
I'd totally forgotten about Pike's small http server. That might allow
me to drop another package from my flash/memory-footprint (lighttpd).
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Currently unemployed programmer:
"What do you mean, I can't initialize things in an assert()?"
|