On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:08:54AM +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> I noticed some (currently) sad truths
i am surprised that you only notice this now.
pike has always had a slow start up
the first discussion on this list about this topic is from 10 years ago:
From: John W Pierce
Subject: Pike speed
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 02:50:00 -0800
Message-ID: <000001be3e19$4dda28c0$<932cd2cc[at]san.rr.com>>
the last one, one year ago:
From: Bertrand LUPART
Subject: [Shootout] startup
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:58:53 +0100
Message-ID: <1icqhp9.19r27i8u3qwfoN%<bertrand.lupart[at]linkeo.com>>
(eeeks, bertrand, why does your mailserver put a valid email address
into the message-id?)
i still do not understand why this is the case.
maybe your research can shed some light on this...
greetings, martin.
--
cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix
searching for contract jobs now: programming, training and administration
--
pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org
foresight developer foresightlinux.org open-steam.org
unix sysadmin iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at caudium.org
Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org
|